Mobility Matters
Home›Mobile robots in the plane›Formation problems›Convergence

Convergence

Robots must get arbitrarily close to a common point; they need not ever meet.

Problem statement and measuresexpand

\(n\) robots start at arbitrary points. For every \(\varepsilon > 0\) there must be a time after which all robots stay within distance \(\varepsilon\) of each other (equivalently, of a common limit point). Robots never need to coincide.

Measures: Time, rounds (FSYNC, SSYNC) or epochs (ASYNC) until the task is done; "finite" when only solvability is known; Colours, colours of the light per robot (0 for oblivious robots).

ASYNC, unlimited visibility

standard settingverified
Time: unknownColours: tight

Moving to the centre of gravity makes oblivious robots converge in ASYNC, for any \(n\).

Assumed (added on the last edge are outlined)

+Bodypoint robots+Visibilityunlimited+Opacitytransparent: every robot sees every robot within range+Faultsno faults

Not assumed

Schedulerasynchronous (ASYNC)Lights (persistent memory)oblivious, no light (OBLOT)Agreement on coordinatesno agreement on local coordinate systemsMovementnon-rigid: the adversary may stop a move after some minimum distance \(\delta\)Multiplicity detectionnone: a point with several robots looks like one robotRandomnessdeterministicIdentifiersanonymous: all robots are identical
Formal definitions of this setting
Body: point
Each robot is a point of the plane: several robots may share a point (multiplicity), and a robot hides only what lies exactly behind it on a line of sight.
Visibility: unlimited visibility
A robot sees all robots (subject to opacity).
Opacity: transparent
Robots do not obstruct each other's view.
Faults: no faults
All robots follow the algorithm forever.
Scheduler: ASYNC
ASYNC: each robot's Look, Compute and Move phases take finite but unbounded, adversarially chosen time; a robot may look while others move, and compute on an outdated snapshot. Time is counted in epochs: an epoch is an interval of time in which every robot completes at least one full Look–Compute–Move cycle; it need not be the shortest such interval. The execution is divided into consecutive epochs, and a bound of \(X\) epochs holds for every such division. In FSYNC and SSYNC time is counted in rounds. Called Corda by Prencipe Prencipe 2007. Intermediate variants restrict interleavings: LC-atomic (no Look by another robot between a robot's Look and its Compute), Move-atomic (no Look during another robot's Move) and CM-atomic Flocchini et al. 2023.
Lights (persistent memory): oblivious
OBLOT: a robot's computation depends only on the current snapshot; nothing persists across cycles.
Agreement on coordinates: disoriented
Each robot \(r\) observes in its own coordinate system, obtained from the global one by an unknown similarity (translation, rotation, uniform scaling, and possibly reflection); systems may differ between robots and, in some models, between cycles. Papers that call robots disoriented do not always mean this: Défago and Souissi use the word while assuming chirality Défago & Souissi 2008. Some papers also let the adversary change a robot's rotation, reflection and unit at every Look (variable disorientation) Flocchini et al. 2023 Masuzawa et al. 2026.
Movement: non-rigid
In a Move phase the adversary may stop a robot before its destination, but only after it has travelled at least \(\delta>0\) (a constant unknown to the robots) or reached the destination.
Multiplicity detection: no multiplicity detection
A snapshot is a set of points: a point occupied by several robots looks like a single robot.
Randomness: deterministic
The destination computed in a cycle is a function of the snapshot (and the light, if any).
Identifiers: anonymous
Robots are indistinguishable and run the same algorithm.

What is known

Time · rounds (FSYNC, SSYNC) or epochs (ASYNC) until the task is done; "finite" when only solvability is known
unknown
See the notes for convergence-time results.
lower boundnone known
introductory—
current best
\(\text{finite}\)
Colours · colours of the light per robot (0 for oblivious robots)
tight
No colours.
lower boundnone known
introductory—
current best
\(0\)

Results, in order of publication

Cohen & Peleg 2005 current best
Time \(\text{finite}\)Colours \(0\)

Introductory and current best for ASYNC; also tolerates crash faults (the exact bound on \(f\) was not checked).

Open questions

None recorded for this variant.

Notes

Convergence time of the centre-of-gravity algorithm: Cord-Landwehr et al. 2011 show that \(O(n)\) rounds halve the diameter of the convex hull, improving \(O(n^2)\), against a known \(\Omega(n)\). Unverified: the scheduler of that analysis.

What carries over from neighbouring settings

Read off the order of assumptions, not checked case by case: results may carry extra assumptions (shown on their pages), and asynchronous time is measured in epochs.

Algorithms from weaker settings work here

Limited visibility, asynchronous
Time \(\text{finite}\)Colours \(0\)

Lower bounds from stronger settings hold here

No catalogued stronger setting.

Know a better result for this setting, or found a mistake? Suggest a result · Report an error. Accepted contributions are acknowledged.