Evacuation
Robots start at the centre of a disk (or a polygon) and must all leave through an exit at an unknown point of the boundary, as fast as possible.
Problem statement and measuresexpand
\(k\) unit-speed robots start together at the centre of a unit disk (or the centroid of a unit equilateral triangle or square). An exit lies at an unknown point of the boundary; a robot recognises it only on reaching it. Time is the worst case, over exit positions, of the time until the last robot reaches the exit (in priority evacuation, where one robot is the queen: until the queen does).
Measures: Evacuation time, worst-case time until the last robot (or the queen) reaches the exit; unit disk, unit speed.
Line, \(2f+1\) wireless robots, \(f\) crash faults
verifiedWith a near majority of faulty robots, evacuation on the line takes ratio about \(7.437\) for \((k,f) = (3,1)\), tending to \(4+2\sqrt2\); the lower bounds come from search.
Assumed (added on the last edge are outlined)
Not assumed
Formal definitions of this setting
- Domain: line
- The robots start at the origin of the real line; the exit is at an unknown point at distance at least \(1\); the measure is the competitive ratio, the evacuation time divided by that distance.
- Number of robots: any \(k\)
- \(k\ge1\) robots.
- Goal: all robots
- The task ends when the last robot reaches the exit.
- Exits: one exit
- One exit, at an unknown point of the boundary.
- Communication: wireless
- Wireless: every robot can send messages to every other robot instantly at any distance.
- Faults: crash faults
- Up to \(f\) robots may fail to detect or to report the target when they pass over it.
- Speeds: equal speeds
- All robots move at most at unit speed.
- Randomness: deterministic
- Trajectories are fixed functions of the information received.
Statement for this variant
\(k = 2f+1\) robots, of which up to \(f\) may fail to report the exit; every non-faulty robot must reach it.
What is known
- \((k,f) = (3,1)\)
- inherited from search with crash faults
Results, in order of publication
Introductory and current best for \((3,1)\); \(7.254\) for \((5,2)\) and \((7,3)\), \(7.147\) for \((9,4)\), tending to \(4+2\sqrt2\) (Theorems 2.2, 3.1, 3.2).
Open questions
Tight bounds for evacuation with \(k = 2f+1\) crash or Byzantine robots Czyzowicz et al. 2021.
Notes
When every attempt to turn fails with known probability \(\beta < 1/2\) (the paper's \(p\)), two wireless robots achieve ratio \(3+4\sqrt{\beta(1-\beta)}+\varepsilon\) Georgiou et al. 2024. Checked against the full text of Czyzowicz et al. 2021.
What carries over from neighbouring settings
Read off the order of assumptions, not checked case by case: results may carry extra assumptions (shown on their pages), and asynchronous time is measured in epochs.
Algorithms from weaker settings work here
No catalogued weaker setting.
Lower bounds from stronger settings hold here
Know a better result for this setting, or found a mistake? Suggest a result · Report an error. Accepted contributions are acknowledged.