Leader election in programmable matter
Anonymous constant-memory particles must elect exactly one leader, which most shape-formation algorithms need first.
Problem statement and measuresexpand
A connected configuration (the set of nodes occupied by particles) of \(n\) anonymous particles (initially contracted) must reach a state in which exactly one particle is the leader and all others know they are not. Time is in asynchronous rounds; \(L_{out}\) is the length of the outer boundary and \(D\) the diameter of the configuration.
Measures: Time, asynchronous rounds; Moves, total expansions and contractions (work).
Stationary, fair scheduler, no orientation, no holes
verifiedStationary constant-memory particles with no orientation and no chirality elect a unique leader from any initial memory: silent self-stabilising election on simply connected systems.
Assumed (added on the last edge are outlined)
Not assumed
Formal definitions of this setting
- Memory: constant memory
- Each particle has \(O(1)\) bits of persistent memory and reads or writes neighbours' memory.
- Scheduler: strong scheduler
- Each activation is executed atomically; the adversary chooses the order, fairly.
- Orientation: no orientation
- Each particle labels its six incident directions in its own clockwise or counter-clockwise order, starting anywhere.
- Movement: stationary
- No particle ever expands or contracts; the configuration is fixed and only states change.
- Randomness: deterministic
- No random choices.
- Initial shape: no holes
- The initial configuration is connected and encloses no empty node. Also called contractible Briones et al. 2023 or hole-free Gastineau et al. 2019.
- Connectivity during execution: stays connected
- At every time the occupied nodes induce a connected subgraph.
What is known
Results, in order of publication
Introductory and current best. The algorithm fails under an unfair scheduler (Section 6). Constant memory suffices although silent self-stabilising election in general networks needs \(\Omega(\log n)\) bits, even on rings.
Open questions
None recorded for this variant.
Notes
Self-stabilisation is a stronger requirement than the problem statement and has no axis here. Checked against the full text.
What carries over from neighbouring settings
Read off the order of assumptions, not checked case by case: results may carry extra assumptions (shown on their pages), and asynchronous time is measured in epochs.
Algorithms from weaker settings work here
Lower bounds from stronger settings hold here
Know a better result for this setting, or found a mistake? Suggest a result · Report an error. Accepted contributions are acknowledged.